In line with longstanding initiatives to expand its green spaces, New York City is planting tens of thousands of trees each year. They provide shade, lower surface temperatures by releasing moisture, absorb a surprising amount of airborne carbon, clean out soot and other pollutants, and offer wildlife habitat along with beauty. What could go wrong?
Actually, something could go wrong, according to a new study. Oaks and sweetgums, which currently make up most of the city’s trees, produce large amounts of volatile compounds called isoprenes. Harmless on their own, isoprenes quickly interact with polluting nitrogen oxides from vehicles, buildings, and industry to form ground-level ozone―a key factor in many respiratory ailments, especially chronic bronchitis and asthma.
The research, carried out by scientists at the Columbia Climate School’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory and other institutions, found that if the city continues to plant the same species, isoprene production in Manhattan will increase by about 140% in coming decades, and resulting summer ozone levels by as much as 30%. In Queens, which has the most space for more trees, isoprene production could quadruple, with corresponding increases in peak ozone; the other boroughs fall somewhere in between. The study was just published in the journal Environmental Science & Technology.
“We’re all for planting more trees. They bring so many good things,” said study coauthor Róisín Commane, an atmospheric chemist at Lamont-Doherty. “But if we’re not careful, we could make air quality worse.”
The leaves of some tree species emit isoprene as a byproduct of photosynthesis, though the reason is unclear. For oaks, emissions increase with heat until air temperatures reach the high 90s. Some scientists believe this helps keep leaf tissues from drooping and losing their ability to photosynthesize as it gets hotter. Emissions of these and other volatile compounds by trees may also help attract pollinating insects. Oaks and sweetgums are particularly prolific; oaks emit 800 times more isoprene than low emitters like maples or London planes. The oak-rich Blue Ridge Mountains get their bluish tinge from vast amounts of isoprene and other volatile compounds reacting with water to form tiny floating droplets.
New York City has around seven million trees, covering 22% of the surface, according to the city Parks Department, which manages planting and maintenance on public property. Parks and forests contain about five million trees, more than half of which are various kinds of oaks and sweetgums (37% and 17% respectively). On the streets, with close to 700,000 trees, oaks make up 18% and sweetgums just a small number. London planes are the most common street trees, making up a third. About 130 other species account for the rest.
The authors of the new study analyzed newly available satellite imagery showing the city’s tree canopy in 30-by-30-meter grids and combined it with 2016 and 2018 Parks Department censuses of tree species. They used data from scientists, including study coauthor Andrew Reinmann, an environmental ecologist at the City University of New York Graduate Center, who does lab experiments on tree leaves to measure their isoprene production under different conditions. The researchers scaled up the lab data to the city’s actual tree coverage and modeled how trees interact with tailpipe and building emissions of nitrogen oxides.
They found that emissions from trees play a controlling role in the formation of ozone on hot summer days, when levels routinely exceed the federal safety levels of 70 parts per billion. Levels sometimes reach 100 parts per billion; adding new trees could eventually drive it up even further, says the study.
But isoprene from trees alone is not to blame. Ozone cannot form without one essential precursor chemical: nitrogen oxides, also known as NOx, emitted during combustion of fossil fuels by vehicles, hot-water boilers, power plants, and industry.
“If we lowered NOx significantly, trees wouldn’t be a problem,” said Wei. “We don’t want to convey the idea that trees pollute the air. It’s the cars.”
New York has made progress in reducing nitrogen oxides in recent years, but the pace has been slow. The study says that at current rates of 2% to 5% a year, it would take 30 to 80 years for the city to reduce emissions by a factor of five―the level at which emissions from trees would no longer affect ozone formation.
No quick fix is in sight. The city’s Local Law 97 mandates that many buildings become carbon neutral, which would largely eliminate fossil fuels―but not until 2050―and electric vehicles are still rare. In June, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul canceled a long-planned congestion pricing in Manhattan. Prospects for its revival are uncertain.
Meanwhile, the City Council passed a 2023 resolution to increase tree-canopy coverage from 22% to at least 30% by 2035. This would require 250,000 new trees. A 2022 study by The Nature Conservancy found that canopy cover could be increased to 42% without affecting existing landscapes like buildings and roads.
The Parks Department is aware of the issue. A 2020 study by its researchers found that city trees emit more than 800 tons of volatile compounds each year, including isoprene. “We didn’t make a big deal of that,” said Novem Auyeong, a Parks Department senior scientist. She said trees should not be seen as the enemy. “We could plant any trees we want to, if we just rethink our car-centric lifestyle,” she said.
The department has already reduced the proportion of oaks it plants in favor of a more diverse mix―not because of the isoprene issue. There was a mass die-off of the city’s American elms in the 20th century, and recently, of ash trees, both due to introduced exotic pests. “We’ve learned our lesson. We’re trying to diversify so if one pest comes along, we have other trees,” said Auyeong.
The department focuses on trees native to the region, including native oaks. Of 55,533 trees planted in the city’s forested areas from 2018 to 2023, 20% were oaks. On the streets, 57,335 trees were planted; 17% of them were oaks. In the fiscal year ending this June, about 18,000 more were planted, though the species composition is not yet available.
“We’re not going to go cutting down any big old oaks,” and neither will the department completely stop planting new ones, said Auyeong. “You have to think about what you would lose if you do that.” Oaks are keystone species, she pointed out, providing food and habitat for native insects, birds and mammals. They provide excellent shade, can grow in relatively small spaces, and unlike other desirable shade species such as tulip trees, are relatively unbothered by the city’s stew of air pollution, ozone and otherwise. Importantly, northern red oaks in particular can function in high temperatures when other trees shut down. Up to a point, they may in fact grow even better as the climate gets hotter, according to a 2008 study.
“Oaks are tough trees. They might be able to survive climate change,” said Commane. “There are still wonderful reasons to have them around.”
