Cyberleek, the anonymous figure behind a wave of Grand Theft Auto 6 leaks, has escalated their campaign with a new explicit video focused on co-protagonist Lucia Caminos and a demand for fans to inflate the value of a meme cryptocurrency to a $30 million market cap in exchange for access to a playable development build of the game.
As first reported in detail by outlets following the leak saga, Cyberleek initially grabbed attention earlier in October with a 24–25 minute clip sourced from a GTA 6 development build that showed extensive story snippets, car chases and the male lead Jason Duvall wandering around Leonida fully nude, complete with physics-enabled genitalia and access to a developer menu. Multiple publications that viewed the footage noted that it appeared legitimate, carrying Cyberleek’s watermark and revealing cutscenes involving Jason and Lucia, first-person driving, and mission content that many fans would rather encounter for the first time in the finished game.
The latest twist shifts the spotlight to Lucia and folds in a crypto grift angle. According to coverage of the new clip, Cyberleek’s site and associated channels now host a video where Lucia appears totally nude, exploring what looks like downtown Vice City, leaping from a classic car, scaling a tall building, and performing a base jump as part of a side activity while completely exposed. Insider reports say this Lucia-focused footage follows a recent poll in the leaker’s community that overwhelmingly requested explicit content starring her, which Cyberleek has now delivered while tying it to the promise of releasing a full playable build if supporters drive their meme coin’s market cap to $30 million.
Polygon’s reporting notes that Lucia is also depicted in a different sequence as a model with braided hair at the start of the game, apparently incarcerated for an undisclosed crime, with Cyberleek using this more grounded character moment as part of the tease before pivoting to fully nude gameplay. Clips and GIFs of the video have ricocheted across social media, but many posts are being pulled shortly after upload due to their explicit nature and possible copyright violations, creating a whack-a-mole situation where NSFW snippets and spoiler-heavy moments briefly surface before disappearing. Other outlets highlight how the leak has sparked debate over how NPCs (or a lack of reaction from them) respond to characters walking around completely naked, with fans questioning how much of this behavior reflects shipping-game design versus tools and toggles only present in internal developer builds.
Behind the scenes, Rockstar Games’ parent company Take-Two Interactive has reportedly continued legal efforts to identify and stop the leaker, including subpoenaing various firms for records tied to earlier GTA 6 footage that appeared online, but Cyberleek’s reemergence with more material suggests the hunt is far from over. Eurogamer and other outlets that have examined both the Jason and Lucia videos emphasize that they are drawing from what seems to be a genuine development environment, where features like a debug menu make it possible to force scenarios—such as total nudity in regular cutscenes—that may never exist in the retail release. That distinction has become a key talking point among fans worried that sensational clips are distorting expectations around the finished game’s tone and content.
For GTA diehards, the temptation to chase every leak is obvious, but this latest crypto-tied stunt raises new red flags beyond story spoilers and NSFW imagery. Any promise of early access to a “playable build” in exchange for pumping a meme coin sits squarely in scam territory, with no guarantee that Cyberleek can or will deliver what they’re dangling, and plenty of risk for anyone who pours money into a volatile token just for the chance to peek behind Rockstar’s curtain. As the studio inches toward an official marketing push for GTA 6, the Lucia and Jason leaks are effectively running a shadow campaign that trades on shock value and stolen work, leaving fans to decide whether a few minutes of illicit footage are worth the ethical, legal, and financial fallout that may follow.
